Critics to La Vuelta for hiring the influence Erola Jons: "It's an absolute shame"
FERNANDO M. CARREÑO Updated 24 / 08 / 2026 - 12: 07 CAST Of course, if what he intended who took Erola Jon to LaVureta was' visibility ', that is, that..
- Center1
- Right1
no rewrites detected — all voices distinct
Summary
We simply do not know whether a cyclist who has been made 180 kilometers in full sun, who has raised a port to 10% or has dropped it to 100 per hour, then it is funny to be chosen as a comparison of an influence. Because one of the most striking things is that LaVuelta made a decision in 2017 about podium stewardess trying to eliminate the alleged sexism, the alleged cossification of women, which some images, such as the kiss of the winner, etc., represented. There, Jons went to Tadej Pogačar calling him "Pogachitar" and made several comments away from the sporting context, including a striking "why do you hyperventilate when you see me?".
Furthermore, "I absolutely agree with what she says," De Andrés said, supporting the criticism put forward by Meseguer.
Cross-referenced from 2 sources.
Factual coreconfirmed by several independent voices
Insufficient core: not enough independent confirmations to retain a shared fact.
Reported detailssecondary facts, each attributed to its source
We simply do not know whether a cyclist who has been made 180 kilometers in full sun, who has raised a port to 10% or has dropped it to 100 per hour, then it is funny to be chosen as a comparison of an influence.
according to MarcaBecause one of the most striking things is that LaVuelta made a decision in 2017 about podium stewardess trying to eliminate the alleged sexism, the alleged cossification of women, which some images, such as the kiss of the winner, etc., represented.
according to MarcaThere, Jons went to Tadej Pogačar calling him "Pogachitar" and made several comments away from the sporting context, including a striking "why do you hyperventilate when you see me?".
according to The Objective"I absolutely agree with what she says," De Andrés said, supporting the criticism put forward by Meseguer.
according to The Objective
Disputedincompatible versions — to verify
No factual contradiction detected between sources.
Framing by sidesame fact, different words — loaded terms highlighted
No notable framing divergence.
Blind spotwhat one side keeps silent
No blind spot detected: every side covers the same facts.
Sources2 sources cross-checked
Center1
Right1
