The second pretrial decision of Roy Suryo at the South Jakarta District Court will be read out on Monday afternoon

Factual coreconfirmed by several independent voices

• Declares that the investigation conducted by the Respondent based on: Investigation Order number: SP.Sidik/S1.1/3147/VII/2025/Ditreskrimum/Polda Metro Jaya dated 14 July 2025; Investigation Warrant Number: SP.Sidik/94/I/2026/Ditres-krimum/Polda Metro Jaya, dated 15 January 2026; Investigation Order number: SP.Sidik/1043/III/2026/Ditreskrimum/Polda Metro Jaya dated 30 March 2026; is INVALID because it was carried out unlawfully, namely by violating the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 21/PUU-XII/2014, dated 28 April 2015; 5.

  reliability moderate2/2 sources

Reported detailssecondary facts, each attributed to its source

• Declares that the Co-Respondent complies with and submits to the a quo decision; 9.

  according to Sindonews

Disputedincompatible versions — to verify

No factual contradiction detected between sources.

Framing by sidesame fact, different words — loaded terms highlighted

No notable framing divergence.

Blind spotwhat one side keeps silent

• Declares that the investigation conducted by the Respondent based on: Investigation Order number: SP.Sidik/S1.1/3147/VII/2025/Ditreskrimum/Polda Metro…

  omitted byPublic / Agenciescovered byCenter

Sources3 sources cross-checked

Images from the sourcesThe photos each outlet chose to illustrate this story — click to open the article.

• Antara
• Sindonews